Formula One last time

F1 2018: Catch it while you can...

It’s set to be a thrilling season for Formula One fans.

Both Britain’s Lewis Hamilton and Germany’s Sebastian Vettel have now achieved four world titles each, with Hamilton equalling his arch-rival’s tally last year. Who was battling it out for that title last time? Yup – those two. It wasn’t always the most gentlemanly of battles either, with Seb famously banging wheels with Lewis after he believed the Brit had brake-tested him.

So far, so tremendously entertaining. True, Vettel’s team, Ferrari, along with their driver himself, lost the plot somewhat when it really counted. Happily, it looks like we may be on for another ding-dong (and potentially bodywork-bashing) re-match.

The cars look a little different this year too. Imagine someone sticking the bit that goes on top of your foot from a flip-flop onto the cockpit of the cars, and you’ve pretty much got the ‘halo’. This controversial new safety feature should help protect drivers from injuries caused by flying debris, cars going over the top of each other and loose wheels. But it isn’t pretty.

Liberty Media, F1’s new owners who took over management of the sport last year, will doubtlessly be continuing their efforts to make the sport more of a ‘show’. To be fair, they’ve made a pretty good go of it so far – expect new innovations and features.

Apart from Ferrari, and Hamilton’s team, Mercedes, expect Red Bull to be somewhere nearby, and likely to grab the occasional win when the other two have a poor weekend. McLaren, the once-great team, have spent the last few seasons either at the back or on the back of a breakdown truck, thanks to a hopeless Honda partnership that backfired, rather than going with a bang. If they can nail reliability issues, their new Renault deal might see them return to somewhere near the front.

If McLaren are in the midfield, they are likely to find it rather crowded. Force India remain strong, and the American Haas team looked promising in winter testing. The works Renault team may be in there too, and Williams as well. Even Toro Rosso seem to be coping admirably with the unloved Honda engine. Its likely Sauber will still be the backmarkers, even with support from Alfa Romeo.

Whilst Hamilton and Vettel will be the main attraction, their team-mates, Valtteri Bottas and Kimi Raikkonen, may pull of the odd surprise, as will Red Bull’s boys, Max Verstappen and Daniel Ricciardo.

Sadly, unless you happen to have forked out for Sky’s coverage, the terrestrial TV package, from Channel 4, will once again feature only half the races live, with the others as highlights packages. Come 2019, even that will be something to remember wistfully, as Sky will have all the coverage.

Supposedly, highlights of each race will be available, but as yet there’s no announcement of how us mere mortals are supposed to get to see it. 2018 may be a vintage year for F1. Enjoy every last drop, because soon it will be gone for good.

This post first appeared as the lead piece in my column/page in The Mail and the News & Star, on the 23rd of March 2018. It was re-titled as "The flip flop of Formula 1", and featured a couple of pictures from down under, which was nicely topical.

I've watched formula one for over 30 years, and have seen TV coverage go from random highlights packages, through ITV with adverts, the expansive BBC live coverage, and the more recent 50/50 highlights vs live. Channel 4 in the UK do a great job with this limited package, but after this season...? Well, no-one currently seems to be telling the country's fans that. Which is pretty disgraceful.

(CD A-Z: Still suspended. All the CD's are boxed up ready for a house move.)

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog