Skip to main content

Stats aren't so smashing

The RAC Foundation say that young drivers are “more likely to crash”.

In other news, the Pope is, apparently, “likely to be Catholic”.

Apart from stating the bleeping obvious, the RAC Foundation do have a very serious point. 12% of people hurt or killed in a shunt are involved in an accident with 17-19 year olds.

That’s shocking. Even more so when you take into account that drivers in that age range make up just 1.5% of those with a driving licence.

To make an already appalling statistic even more alarming, that 12% figure jumps up to a whopping 15.8% on roads here in Cumbria. Plans to introduce a probationary licence system were recently put on hold by the government. These would have included a ‘curfew’ period unless the car contained someone over 30, lower legal alcohol limits, and drivers doing some of their learning stages in Motorway conditions.

I was pretty terrified the first time I drove in traffic (a milk float, someone on a bicycle and the nice old lady from 2 doors up in her Allegro), so I can’t imagine the look of abject terror on a teenager’s face if they were flung into motorway conditions early on.

But surely there is some sense to these proposed restrictions? It truly is a liberating experience to be driving unaccompanied for the first time, but should we be willing to restrict that freedom a little, in the name of increased safety?

This seems to be the issue at the heart of the Department for Transport’s decision; They don’t want to restrict the lives of young people.

As we’ve recently established, I was young at some distant, sepia-toned, point in the past, and purchased my first car (an orange Mini with fur-lined doors, because I’m worth it) for the princely sum of £300. I hadn’t driven for six months, as I’d been saving up since passing my test.

I wasn’t allowed to drive my Dad’s car, thanks largely to my elder brother and an incident involving Glam Rock platform boots and a brake pedal interface error. I’m not clear if Dad was grey-haired at that point in the ‘70s, but he certainly was afterwards.

But there I was, driving across an unfamiliar part of town, hair full of styling mousse, using a vague memory of what I was supposed to be doing as guidance.

As the months passed, my confidence grew and I became invincible, able to fling my tiny car down even tinier country lanes, safe in the knowledge that I was a better driver than all the older people on the road, and had faster reactions, even after a pint or two.

It turns out that in my teenage years I was a dangerous idiot, put others at immense risk, and had an ego the size of my bouffant-ed hairstyle. Apart from that, I was a terrible driver too.

Restrict the ability of a small minority of car drivers, to increase the safety of everyone else? Where do I sign?

This post first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column, in the North West Evening Mail, on the 30th of May 2014. You can view the version used by the paper here which, shockingly, is actually several words longer than the one I submitted.

On closer inspection, they replaced '%' with 'per cent'. They also changed the title to "Crash stats are not so smashing". Quite a day for longeriness occurring...

(Am I still on the compilation CDs? Yup. A rather splendid one called "The New Generation - Future's Burning" tonight, featuring the likes of Franz Ferdinand, The Libertines, Kaiser Chiefs etc. It's very... "Oi!".)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A fisful of change at the shops

A recent day out reminded me how much the retail experience has altered during my lifetime – and it’s not all good. I could stop typing this, and buy a fridge, in a matter of seconds. The shops are shut and it’s 9pm, but I could still place the order and arrange delivery. I haven’t got to wander round a white-goods retail emporium trying to work out which slightly different version of something that keeps my cider cold is better. It’ll be cheaper, too. But in amongst the convenience, endless choice and bargains, we’ve lost some of the personal, human, touches that used to make a trip to the shops something more than just a daily chore. Last weekend, we visited a local coastal town. Amongst the shops selling over-priced imported home accessories (who doesn’t need another roughly-hewn wooden heart, poorly painted and a bargain at £10?) was one that looked different. It’s window allowed you to see in, rather than being plastered with stick-on graphics and special offers calling ...

Making an exhibition of yourself

Now and again, it’s good to reaffirm that you’re a (relatively) normal human being. One excellent way of doing this is to go to a business exhibition. Despite what you might have surmised from reading my previous columns, I am employable, and even capable of acting like a regular person most of the time, even joining in the Monday morning conversation about the weather over the weekend, and why (insert name of footyballs manager here) should be fired immediately. The mug! True, there are times, often involving a caffeine deficiency, where it is like having the distilled essence of ten moody teenagers in the room, but I try and get that out of the way when people I genuinely like aren’t around to see it. As part of my ongoing experiment with what others call ‘working’, my ‘job’ involves me occasionally needing to go and see what some of my colleagues get up to outside the office, and what our competitors do to try and make sure that they do whatever my colleagues do better than ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...