Skip to main content

Burying your mistakes

Video game archaeologists are a thing now, apparently.

So when did the future become the past?

Apart from all the other reasons (aches and pains, not understanding what a ‘One Direction’ is, inner-ear hair growth etc.) it’s another sure sign I’m getting old.

This particular history lesson is a warning from a time when video games consoles had just been hewn from the rawest of plastic, and squash consumption left you with orange glass-marks either side of your mouth for the rest of the day.

In a time before video had finished off the radio star, the late 70s saw the thrilling arrival of interactive games (of any shape imaginable, but only if it was made up of squares) you could play on your television, as long as your Mum wasn’t watching The Generation Game, and it wasn’t past your bedtime. And you could afford it. And you hadn’t been sent to bed early for smacking your little brother round the head with a Monopoly board. Again.

What with VHS recording and the digital watch, the largely brown and yellow (with a bit of burnt orange) 1970s came alive with technological brilliance to entertain us, as long as you didn’t mind staring at a screen. Ooo, how times have changed.

Console King during this time was Atari, whose rapid success helped the Star Wars generation feel part of the Sci-Fi future with exciting graphics, thrilling game play, lots of beepy noises and getting you told off by your dad for forgetting to plug the aerial back in again in time for Grandstand.

Their 2600 console (imagine the dashboard of a Ford Cortina and you’re in the right area) had already seen the wonders of Asteroids, the triangular ship that spent all day shooting rocks and yearning for the occasional alien space ship, and Centipede, a terrifyingly poorly rendered creature that split into bits when you shot it - but carried on attacking!, by the time 1982 rolled around, all snoods, ra-ra skirts and excessive amounts of hairspray.

ET was a smash at the cinema, and it seemed sensible for the Extra Terrestrial to have it’s own game. Hastily written in five weeks, Atari made millions of copies, only spotting the two fatal injuries it has inflicted upon itself too late: The game was awful, and they’d made more copies than there were actual machines to play them on.

With the situation looking so bad that even a Co-operative Bank would feel pretty smug, they buried the lot in the desert, as you do in these situations.

Like some sort of Holy Grail quest, a dig has finally uncovered some copies, allowing us to once again see what a gigantic cock-up it all was, and enabling ‘kids these days’ to wonder out loud how we could ever have thought that sort of thing was cool, before forgetting what they were saying mid sentence and continuing their attempt to beat the high score on Candy Crush on their phone.

Game (still) over.

This post first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column in the North West Evening Mail on the 2nd of May 2014. You can view the edited version used by the paper on their website here 32 words went missing, including the description of 1982's attributes, the co-op joke, and "cock-up" being replaced by "shambles".

I really enjoyed writing this one, which was surprising, as a nasty case of having no idea what to write about had been taking place for quite a while, as I stared forlornly at a blank Word document.

This also marked the anniversary of my 1st column 2 years ago. Yikes.

(Interesting CD from Mojo magazine playing right now: Revolver Reloaded. Some interpretations of the songs from the Beatles album, which, to my mind, is a great thing to do. The Beatles were amazing, but they certainly aren't sacrosanct.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi