Skip to main content

Mixed reception for countryside living

We moved house last month. I now live in what can best be described as a rural location.

Even without opening my eyes in the morning, I am reminded of the countryside just outside my window by a wildlife chorus made up of bleating, tweeting, squawking and the occasional moo. Beats the sound of traffic any day, although what engine noise we do get has a much higher percentage of agricultural vehicle notes than I’m accustomed too, interspersed with hints of trains.

Just like any modern nerd, prior to the move I exhaustively investigated how to connect myself to the outside world from the middle of nowhere. Clearly, broadband is now right up there on the list of life’s essential requirements – somewhere just after air and water, but probably jostling for position with warmth and food.

Much to my delight, it turned out that our new pad is on the edge of the B4RN area – meaning the availability of fibre optic cable, not just to a nearby green cabinet, but right through the wall into our house. If your techy-person skills don’t have you fretting about how many MBs upload speed you can get, then imagine it like this; if your average broadband were water, most suppliers ship is down a huge pipe, but at the last minute switch to delivering it into your house via a straw with a kink in it.

Instead, I can listen to the wildlife outside whilst getting hosed down by a stream of high pressure data that has my computer trembling. Stream high definition video? Yup. VOIP phone? Hell yeah. Download music so fast, I have to check it’s actually done it? Pow! I’ve apparently got faster speeds than at my employer’s offices.

So far, so not-quite-sure-what-to-do-with-it-all-good. Next up was the investigation into what TV channels I was likely to get. At our previous palace, our aerial delivered a somewhat limited selection of Freeview channels into our gogglebox. Mrs G was always bitterly disappointed not to get non-stop American action drama, and I pined for the amusing stuff (and endless repeats of Top Gear) on Dave.

After tuning in our TV after the big move, we were startled to get all of that and more. So many channels, that there was a risk of the battery in the remote going flat before you could scroll through all of them. Happy days! Until Monday. That was the day the horrifying words “No signal” appeared. Eek. It’ll be temporary, we thought. The aerial hadn’t been stolen by boisterous sheep, and there were no obvious dangly cables. We checked all our connections. Tried different cables. Nothing. No NCIS marathon. No vintage episodes of QI.

On checking with neighbours, we were helpfully told that the signal is very weak where we are, and gets affected by the weather easily. Ah.

We thought it was all going a bit too swimmingly. At least my ridiculously fast internet connection is allowing me to research how I get Freesat instead. The novelty of staring at sheep wears off surprisingly quickly.

Technology 1 : Rural Location 1

I suppose I could go outside...

This post first appeared as the lead piece in my column/page in The Mail and News & Star, on the 11th of May 2018. The title was altered slightly to "Mixed reception for country life".

TV viewing update: Now have a Freesat box - connected it all up today and it seems to be working. I thought "Great! Now I can watch the Spanish GP highlights on Channel 4 later!". Went through all the channels trying to find 4 in HD... after a bit of online research, it turns out it's the one main channel NOT available in HD on Freesat. Jeez...

(CD A-Z: The RCD Blues Collection.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.