Skip to main content

Be a good sport

Image
By

Every hero needs a villain. Two British sports stars have recently found out the hard way that their friendly rivals are anything but.

I may not be an expert on the Tour de France, but I do know how much falling off a bicycle hurts. Teenage years spent larking around on two wheels left their marks, but my top speed would look like I was a slow-motion replay, compared to the rate the skinny-wheeled professionals go.

Which is precisely why I feel for Chris Froome. When I parted company with my ride, or went over the handlebars because I inadvertently put my foot in the spokes of my front wheel (true story), I largely hurt my pride and got a few grazes.

When Chris was elbowed sideways into the barriers at high speed, he didn’t have the 1970s armour that is a sturdy pair of flared jeans and a hand-knitted tank top. His flimsy Lycra was scant protection as he bounced along the road, and I can confirm no-one ever cycled across my head, either.

Froome apparently “gets on well” with Peter Sagan, whose aggressive move resulted him being disqualified from stage four of the event, earlier this week. A patched up Froome crossed the finish line, but a fractured shoulder and stitches in a finger suggest that warm, friendly, rivalry may well have turned distinctly frosty.

Slovakian Sagan apologised, correctly observing that “it’s not nice to crash like that”. A World Champion and a master of understatement. The incident happened in Vittel, which leads me nicely on to bad guy number two...

Whirl back in time a couple of weekends, and another battling Brit was on the receiving end of some decidedly un-sportsman-like behaviour. In an action-packed Azerbaijan Grand Prix, F1 multiple champion Lewis Hamilton was tootling around behind a Safety Car, whilst assorted bits of very expensive car parts were swept off the track following an earlier incident.

As a race is about to get underway again, the driver in front gets to dictate the pace as the Safety Car pulls in, and they can all resume racing after they cross the start line. Hamilton exited a corner, only to be tail-ended by a surprised Sebastian Vettel. The furious German immediately pulled alongside the startled Hamilton and swerved into him, before complaining over the radio to his team that the Mercedes star has “brake-tested” him.

Vettel received a time penalty, but made it clear in post-race interviews that he felt Hamilton was to blame for the incident. Another friendly relationship ruined, then, as Hamilton described Vettel’s actions as “disgusting”.

A subsequent investigation by the sport’s governing body concluded that Vettel’s penalty at the time was sufficient, and the chastened Ferrari driver has issued an apology, accepting blame and acknowledging the poor example he set.

Whilst Sagan and Vettel have rightly been penalised and vilified, I’d be lying if I said it didn’t add to the thrill of watching sport. Every great story needs it’s bad guy. Just try not to get in their way.

This post first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column, in The Mail, on the 7th of July 2017. "Bad sports make such good copy" was the title used for it online, whilst the print edition ran with "The bad guys come good".

 I'm not a cycling fan, so have no understanding of the dynamic between Froome and Sagan, but F1 is definitely my sport of choice. It's therefore been interesting to see the friendly rivalry between Hamilton and Vettel, in the first season to have drivers from different teams evenly matched for several years.

 Hamilton's relationship with former team-mate Rosberg deteriorated rapidly over the last couple of years, and it seemed inevitable that the Seb/Lewis bromance would crash and burn and some point. And boy, did it. And it was glorious.

(CD A-Z: Pink Floyd's hard-to-love "The Final Cut".)

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Making an exhibition of yourself

By
Now and again, it’s good to reaffirm that you’re a (relatively) normal human being. One excellent way of doing this is to go to a business exhibition. Despite what you might have surmised from reading my previous columns, I am employable, and even capable of acting like a regular person most of the time, even joining in the Monday morning conversation about the weather over the weekend, and why (insert name of footyballs manager here) should be fired immediately. The mug! True, there are times, often involving a caffeine deficiency, where it is like having the distilled essence of ten moody teenagers in the room, but I try and get that out of the way when people I genuinely like aren’t around to see it. As part of my ongoing experiment with what others call ‘working’, my ‘job’ involves me occasionally needing to go and see what some of my colleagues get up to outside the office, and what our competitors do to try and make sure that they do whatever my colleagues do better than ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

By
If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...
Post a Comment
Read more

Suffering from natural obsolescence

By
You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...
Post a Comment
Read more