TV With a real X-factor

Forget your ‘talent’ show squawk-fests, it seems that the only show with an ’X’ at the front worth watching, The X-Files, might be coming back to our screens.

The US Sci-Fi-horror-drama managed nine seasons between 1993 and 2002, plus a couple of big screen outings afterwards.

Dark, brooding, paranoid, mysterious and sometimes deeply disturbing - these were just some of my personality traits that neatly matched those of the show. That the Fox network are seriously considering bringing it back is great news indeed for people like me, who badly need some complex conspiracy theories and a spot of sexual tension in their lives. And aliens. Or ARE they?

For those too young to remember, the show was based around two central characters, played by David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, both of whom seem to have taken every available opportunity to get their kit off in subsequent acting gigs.

The two FBI Special Agents, Fox Mulder and Dana Scully, have the slightly tricky task of investigating cases that suggest some kind of paranormal phenomena is at play. Whilst Mulder believes in aliens and just about anything his nickname ‘Spooky’ implies, Scully is the sceptic, partnered with the social outcast in the basement to debunk his findings by her shadowy superiors.

Slowly but surely, Dana starts to believe her partner, via a series of weird, creepy, terrifying and confusing episodes, skilfully allowing the viewer to start believing one thing whilst something altogether different sneaks up behind and taps you on the shoulder in the dark.

And there was a lot of dark. My highly scientific analysis (OK, I guessed) suggests that at least 75% of the shows featured our heroes stumbling around in the dark with torches.

The paranoia was neatly ramped up by fleeting hints of some greater force at work, shadow governments running the ‘real’ ones, cover-ups, misinformation and outright lies.

As with all long-running shows, a story arc gradually appeared that was so complex, and had so many dead-ends, reversals and false-reveals, that I remember wandering around after later episodes had aired with a facial twitch and tightly furrowed brow.

On the bright side, the seemingly never-ending “will they/won’t they” element of the lead characters’ relationship was endlessly tense and exciting, and there was always one episode per series that could loosely be described as comedic, as long as you like your humour so dark it makes a black hole look dazzling.

Apparently, executives will only push on with the idea of it returning if it’s leads, and writer, Chris Carter, are all willing to sign up. With the considerable success of Anderson meaning she’s in huge demand, and Duchovny and Carter’s other commitments, this could take a while to figure out. The great news is, they do all seem interested.

It’s time to stick the “I want to believe” poster back up on the wall, make sure you’ve got some fresh batteries in the torch, and wait patiently to find out if “The truth is out there” still.

This post first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column, in the North West Evening Mail, on the 30th of January 2015. You could read it on the paper's website, if only they'd put it on there. If you'd like to keep an eye out for it, this is the place to look On the plus side, this does mean it's the first time it's been on the web. I'll accept a small round of applause at this point, if you fancy it. No? Oh.

I am genuinely excited by the idea of a return of the X-Files. I bloody loved that show. I also loved Ghostbusters - still my favourite film - and that's semi-definitely making a comeback next year... with an all-new, all-female, cast. True, of the original big three actors from the first film, only Ackroyd and Murray are still alive, and both are 30+ years older, but I'm hoping for cameo appearances, if nothing else.

In the meantime, I'll quietly whistle the X-Files theme at random intervals, and try and slip "I want to believe" into meetings. Such larks.

(Cassetteogram tonight is a BASF Sound Level II - nope, me neither - from 1999, featuring an 80s Mix, They Might Be Giants and Brian May. Yes, you're right... that IS an odd selection.)

A fisful of change at the shops

A recent day out reminded me how much the retail experience has altered during my lifetime – and it’s not all good. I could stop typing this, and buy a fridge, in a matter of seconds. The shops are shut and it’s 9pm, but I could still place the order and arrange delivery. I haven’t got to wander round a white-goods retail emporium trying to work out which slightly different version of something that keeps my cider cold is better. It’ll be cheaper, too. But in amongst the convenience, endless choice and bargains, we’ve lost some of the personal, human, touches that used to make a trip to the shops something more than just a daily chore. Last weekend, we visited a local coastal town. Amongst the shops selling over-priced imported home accessories (who doesn’t need another roughly-hewn wooden heart, poorly painted and a bargain at £10?) was one that looked different. It’s window allowed you to see in, rather than being plastered with stick-on graphics and special offers calling ...

Making an exhibition of yourself

Now and again, it’s good to reaffirm that you’re a (relatively) normal human being. One excellent way of doing this is to go to a business exhibition. Despite what you might have surmised from reading my previous columns, I am employable, and even capable of acting like a regular person most of the time, even joining in the Monday morning conversation about the weather over the weekend, and why (insert name of footyballs manager here) should be fired immediately. The mug! True, there are times, often involving a caffeine deficiency, where it is like having the distilled essence of ten moody teenagers in the room, but I try and get that out of the way when people I genuinely like aren’t around to see it. As part of my ongoing experiment with what others call ‘working’, my ‘job’ involves me occasionally needing to go and see what some of my colleagues get up to outside the office, and what our competitors do to try and make sure that they do whatever my colleagues do better than ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog