Skip to main content

A burning issue

My recent adventure of being awoken at 3.45 by two fire engines was well and truly trumped by Smethwick this week, which had 200 fire personnel tackling a blaze at a recycling centre.

And what triggered the inferno, which saw 100,000 tonnes of plastics ablaze? A Chinese lantern. A little while earlier, someone had set it on it’s catastrophic journey, watched is gently float away, and probably thought “Ah. How beautiful.”

Maybe they were mourning the passing of a loved one, or celebrating a wedding, or were at a party. After it had drifted out of sight, they probably thought no more of it. I sincerely hope they watched the news on Monday with a sense of horror and guilt that it might have been their little lantern that triggered this massive blaze.

Ah well – it’s just some old plastic eh? No real harm done, right? No? On the very same day, 19 firefighters died in Arizona, doing their jobs. Any blaze puts a fire crew at risk, not to mention the lives of members of the public. Even if, mercifully, no-one is even injured, it’s still wrecked someone’s property and maybe their livelihood.

By releasing one of these things, you play the part of the random arsonist – no-one knows where you’ll strike, how much damage you’ll cause, how much misery you might be creating.

And then there’s the risk to livestock: Whilst many of the current lanterns are made with bamboo, some still have wire frames. Either way, they land in farmers fields and, even if they don’t cause a fire, leave their remains to get eaten, caught in farm machinery, or startle animals.

There’s also the false alarms, with sightings out at sea triggering fruitless rescue missions, as more time and money is wasted searching for a flare that never was, from a boat that doesn’t exist. Factor in the risk factor for crews, and again it’s possible to see how one little lantern can have a disastrous effect.

As witnessed in Smethwick (and a large part of the West Midlands, shrouded in acrid smoke and with ash raining down), the fire risk is real. Yes, they mostly extinguish themselves before landing, or fall where they do no harm. Once in a while, they don’t. This incident highlights the potential for far greater damage than a singed field, or traumatised cat.

There have even been concerns that these things could get sucked into aircraft engines, which is genuinely a terrifying thought. Want to remember someone who had died? Don’t burn your cash – make a donation to a charity they supported instead. Want to celebrate a wedding? Get everyone to write a message on a postcard, and send them once a month for the next few years instead. Party? Cheesy Wotsits are nice.

Would you strap a lit candle randomly on your head, forget it, then wander round all day? School? Newsagents? Petrol station..? No, of course not.

Don’t set something on fire when you don’t know where it’s going. That’s flaming stupid.

This post first appeared in my 'Thank grumpy it's Friday' column in the North West Evening Mail, on the 5th of July 2013. You can view it on their website here Just for a change, they used it completely unedited, including the title. I should try being serious more often...

(Still working my way through my CD collection alphabetically. Now onto Ultravox, and the rather splendid 'Lament' album from one of my favourite years, 1984.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with...

Faking it for real

As Donald “I’m really great, everybody says so” Trump is so fond of pointing out, there is a lot of fake news around nowadays. Honest. Your friends at Facebook think so too, and have recently been publishing their top tips for spotting false news – by placing them as ads in newspapers. Considering they came in for considerable criticism themselves, that’s like shouting “Squirrel!” and pointing at a tree whilst you hastily kick away the prize begonias you just trampled. To help you make sense of this (and because I’m a caring person), I thought I’d run you through their suggestions and help to explain them for you. I know. I’m lovely. 1. Be sceptical of headlines READING THIS ARTICLE WILL IMPROVE YOUR SEX LIFE!!! And explain that catchy headlines, or stuff all in capitals might be a bit iffy. 2. Look closely at the URL You can find out more about this at www.wowyouregullible.com if you want to understand how phony web addresses are a sure sign of dodgyness. 3. Investigate...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...