Skip to main content

A burning issue

My recent adventure of being awoken at 3.45 by two fire engines was well and truly trumped by Smethwick this week, which had 200 fire personnel tackling a blaze at a recycling centre.

And what triggered the inferno, which saw 100,000 tonnes of plastics ablaze? A Chinese lantern. A little while earlier, someone had set it on it’s catastrophic journey, watched is gently float away, and probably thought “Ah. How beautiful.”

Maybe they were mourning the passing of a loved one, or celebrating a wedding, or were at a party. After it had drifted out of sight, they probably thought no more of it. I sincerely hope they watched the news on Monday with a sense of horror and guilt that it might have been their little lantern that triggered this massive blaze.

Ah well – it’s just some old plastic eh? No real harm done, right? No? On the very same day, 19 firefighters died in Arizona, doing their jobs. Any blaze puts a fire crew at risk, not to mention the lives of members of the public. Even if, mercifully, no-one is even injured, it’s still wrecked someone’s property and maybe their livelihood.

By releasing one of these things, you play the part of the random arsonist – no-one knows where you’ll strike, how much damage you’ll cause, how much misery you might be creating.

And then there’s the risk to livestock: Whilst many of the current lanterns are made with bamboo, some still have wire frames. Either way, they land in farmers fields and, even if they don’t cause a fire, leave their remains to get eaten, caught in farm machinery, or startle animals.

There’s also the false alarms, with sightings out at sea triggering fruitless rescue missions, as more time and money is wasted searching for a flare that never was, from a boat that doesn’t exist. Factor in the risk factor for crews, and again it’s possible to see how one little lantern can have a disastrous effect.

As witnessed in Smethwick (and a large part of the West Midlands, shrouded in acrid smoke and with ash raining down), the fire risk is real. Yes, they mostly extinguish themselves before landing, or fall where they do no harm. Once in a while, they don’t. This incident highlights the potential for far greater damage than a singed field, or traumatised cat.

There have even been concerns that these things could get sucked into aircraft engines, which is genuinely a terrifying thought. Want to remember someone who had died? Don’t burn your cash – make a donation to a charity they supported instead. Want to celebrate a wedding? Get everyone to write a message on a postcard, and send them once a month for the next few years instead. Party? Cheesy Wotsits are nice.

Would you strap a lit candle randomly on your head, forget it, then wander round all day? School? Newsagents? Petrol station..? No, of course not.

Don’t set something on fire when you don’t know where it’s going. That’s flaming stupid.

This post first appeared in my 'Thank grumpy it's Friday' column in the North West Evening Mail, on the 5th of July 2013. You can view it on their website here Just for a change, they used it completely unedited, including the title. I should try being serious more often...

(Still working my way through my CD collection alphabetically. Now onto Ultravox, and the rather splendid 'Lament' album from one of my favourite years, 1984.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi