Skip to main content

Do you know what really bugs me?

Miniaturised, covert, surveillance devices.

But it seems we don’t need them any more – we just need to ask our Uncle Sam.

This last week has seems some interesting political manoeuvring, whilst our Government squirms uncomfortably in it’s chair like a cornered naughty boy, pointing at their cousin on the other side of the pond and saying “it wasn’t ME! It was HIM!”

If the stories are to be believed, it’s actually both. Whilst there have been strenuous denials on the subject of the UK illegally monitoring it’s own people, the clever Matrix-themed twist is that we’ve actually just let our American chums do it, then looked over their shoulder at the results.

Is it true? Could that really have happened? Do you think anyone would actually tell us if it had? And even if someone did discover the truth, a quick Spooks-style surreptitious look at their internet history, who they’ve texted, the holiday snaps on Facebook and that ill-advised credit card purchase from that ‘specialist clothing’ shop ought to be enough to shut them up for good.

A wise man* once said “I always feel like somebody’s watching me”. (*Rockwell, in his 1984 hit of the same name. Yes, I do base everything on the pop charts of the 80s.)

He was nearly correct – it turns out it’s actually the internet, with the help of some biscuits. In case you’re thinking the Hob-Nobs have turned evil again, I’m actually talking about Cookies, those pesky little hard-to-explain internet things that hang around on your computer and tell the corporate universe what you’re up to. Look at a Justin Bieber CD on Amazon (purely for research purposes, obviously) and every other website you visit for the next week is shoving the annoying tardy teen concert giver in your face. Ew.

After a while, the Cookies gather enough info about you from everything you looked up, purchased, information you entered into a web form etc., that they gain sentience, and wind up sitting on your sofa, eating you Doritos and telling you why you’d like the new Tom Cruise DVD, because of your love of Star Trek and garden gnomes. (I might have exaggerated slightly there, but you get the drift.)

And we tell the web everything. Twitter knows what sport I like and who my friends are, Facebook probably has pictures of you and knows if you’re in a relationship (or if it’s complicated), Tesco know what you like to drink and your favourite brand of chocolate, Amazon knows your taste in music and movies, your Bank knows all about your finances... and that’s just the tip of the terrifying technological iceberg. Factor in the camera in your screen, and the fact you permanently carry a mobile device that locates you to within inches and it becomes clear there’s no need to bug your house. You’ve done it yourself.

I’m off to fashion a helmet out of a colander and tin foil to prevent The Man from stealing my thoughts. Paranoid?

Too bloody right – you should be too.

This post first appeared in my 'Thank grumpy it's Friday' column in the North West Evening Mail on the 14th of June 2013. You can read the edited version used by the paper online here where it was retitled "No need to bug us - we'll do it for you". This actually should have made the final piece longer, as my title got incorporated into the text. Due to a variety of small edits, it actually lost words overall though.

Apologies for the delay in posting this - I was in Wales, climbing up large pointy bits of rock. I suspect this week's column may well be on that very subject...

The NWEM version rapidly received a rather odd comment: "You know what bugs me? Dictators,know alls, people who tell others what to do,and people who are scared of these devices,because they have something to hide,and a guilty conscience." by the interestingly monikered 'captain bluebirdseye'. Hmmm. As the whole purpose of the column, and it's location on a page titled 'Opinion' is for me to express my opinion on a subject, suggesting I'm 'dictating' what someone else should think is a tad unfair. I'm more than happy for you to make your own mind up. I'm certainly not a 'know all' either (at this point we'll gloss over the fact that Dictators generally tell others what to do, and skip the repetition in their diatribe), I can't say I'm particular scared of these devices, and I don't have anything to hide (except possibly the Sheene Easton obsession) or a guilty conscience.

So, to summarise, I would have been mightily displeased by this comment, were it not for the fact that the writer rather blew their credibility by using a made up name, after implying I had something to hide. What an arse.

(Listening to Ken Bruce on Radio2, and wondering what I'd do if I was 2nd person up on Pop Master after someone else got a huge score...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi