Skip to main content

In praise of the costly cuppa

Do you think your latte is a lotta money? Or your cappuccino needs a price cap?

Spare a thought for Boston Tea Party (BTP), an independent coffee chain, who voluntarily banned single use cups last year. It was an expensive decision – to the tune of £250,000.

From June 2018, the chain’s 22 stores decided to put planet before profit, and told their customers they had to bring a reusable cup, pay a deposit on one that they could return, or drink their hot beverage of choice in the branch.
v A bold decision and one that has proven costly. Owner Sam Roberts realised this would happen, and included the loss in his plans. With normal annual sales of £1m worth of takeaway coffees, a 25% drop is a big hit for a relatively small organisation.

Finding that offering 25p off for customers with their own reusable cup didn’t really work (just 5% showed up with cup), BTP decided to really go for it. Roberts has challenged the bigger chains to follow-suit, saying “We felt this was a financial loss we had to take and we want this to be a call to action to other companies”.

According to BTP, their decision has stopped 125,000 cups going in to landfill, as the paper and plastic lining are too difficult to recycle. It’s a great result, but when you consider that 2.5billion cups are just thrown away every year, with only a paltry 0.25% recycled, you can see the scale of the problem – it’s a drop in the already very polluted ocean.

The idea that a “latte levy” would be introduced in last Autumn’s budget was dropped, with ministers opting to leave it to stores to offer a discount if customers bring their own cup. Going on BTP’s experience, that has very little effect.

As a video accompanying a report on BTP’s actions on the BBC News website depressingly revealed, a lot of people really don’t care. One of the interviewees declared it to be a good scheme, but didn’t do it “because I just can’t be bothered with a reusable cup and washing it up myself.”

How depressing. Can you imagine the big chains voluntarily losing 25% of their frothy coffee earnings to help save the environment? Maybe it’s time that we were compelled to do this, rather than politely asked if we wouldn’t mind.

Many of us already bring our own bags to supermarkets. Should cups for coffee be next?

This post first appeared as my 'A wry look at the week' column, in The Mail, on Friday the 5th of April 2019. Both the print version, and the one used on their website, changed the title to "Does your coffee need a price cap?"

Apologies for the delay in posting - I was on holiday last week, which also meant I took the rare decision to notify the paper that I wouldn't be submitting a column for the 12th of April. Back to normal for next week. For now...

(Tape time: No 140, from 1986 and including ELO's "Balance Of Power" album.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with...

Faking it for real

As Donald “I’m really great, everybody says so” Trump is so fond of pointing out, there is a lot of fake news around nowadays. Honest. Your friends at Facebook think so too, and have recently been publishing their top tips for spotting false news – by placing them as ads in newspapers. Considering they came in for considerable criticism themselves, that’s like shouting “Squirrel!” and pointing at a tree whilst you hastily kick away the prize begonias you just trampled. To help you make sense of this (and because I’m a caring person), I thought I’d run you through their suggestions and help to explain them for you. I know. I’m lovely. 1. Be sceptical of headlines READING THIS ARTICLE WILL IMPROVE YOUR SEX LIFE!!! And explain that catchy headlines, or stuff all in capitals might be a bit iffy. 2. Look closely at the URL You can find out more about this at www.wowyouregullible.com if you want to understand how phony web addresses are a sure sign of dodgyness. 3. Investigate...

Going Underground

The US presidential election and Brexit must have made me more nervous than I’d realised. It seems I’ve created an underground bunker without realising I was doing it. Still – we’ve all done that at some point, right? No? Ah... In that case, the fact that I have inadvertently turned my cellar into a rudimentary survival shelter, just in case it all kicks off, demonstrates a severe case of bunker mentality. Fretting about Donald and his wall, and Hillary and her emails, clearly made me more paranoid that I thought about the possibility of WW3 kicking off. Whilst attempting to find a specific size of imperial washer the other day (turns out I’d mis-filed it in the nut cabinet – Tsk!) I was struck by what a lot of jam and chutney we have in the cellar. And I do mean a LOT. There are boxes of boiled-up sugar and fruit and more boxes of boiled up vinegar and fruit. We’re still only part way through 2015’s output too. Then there’s the plastic containers holding pasta in various for...