Skip to main content

Is it OK to play gay?

Jack Whitehall - not gay. Problem?

A new Disney movie is in production.

Not particularly massive news in itself, but the film, called Jungle Cruise, will be the first Disney flick to have a major character who is an openly gay man.

The actor taking on this role, and the associated headache of having to deal with the moral arguments that have ensued, is British – namely Jack Whitehall.

Whitehall says he’s “honoured to be part of this epic adventure”, along with co-stars Emily Blunt and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. Whilst there’s plenty of support for Whitehall on social media, there are also many who aren’t pleased at all about him being cast in the role.

That the first significantly gay role in a Disney movie will be played by a straight guy hasn’t gone down well in some quarters, but the arguments for and against this are complicated.

One point of view is that there’s no reason to cast a gay man to play the role – gay actors play straight parts, and it’s rare anyone bats an eyelid. Shouldn’t a role go to the best actor to play the part, regardless of their sexual preference?

Scarlett Johansson saved herself from a lot of further grief when she removed herself from a movie that would have seen her playing a trans role. Ruby Rose (who says she is “gender fluid”) confessed to being thrilled to get the lead role as openly lesbian Batwoman, but has subsequently deleted her Twitter account following abuse.

That said, things get even more complicated at the suggestion of someone playing a part when the character portrayed has a different ethnicity – as in the original book or story. Here, it’s harder to justify and, increasingly, actors are becoming reluctant to take on these roles (or pulling out of them) due to the backlash from outraged members of the public voicing their anger.

Deadpool actor Ed Skrein withdrew from playing a character of Asian heritage in a Hellboy reboot, with the Brit admitting he was unaware of the character’s comic book origins. So is the fault with the movie makers, rather than the actors themselves? Is this purely about the numbers? Is there a financial benefit to ethnicity-bending in a film?

And we haven’t even touched on the thorny issue of disabled characters being played by able-bodied ones.

Jungle Cruise could be rubbish. It might not be what it’s remembered for, though.

This post first appeared as my 'A wry look at the week' column, in The Mail, on Friday the 17th of August 2018. The paper re-titled it as "Playing it too straight, Disney?"

Hot topic this, and exceedingly easy to put your foot in it and offend/antagonise someone, such is the sensitivity around the subject matter, the range of opinions, and difficulty is knowing what language and descriptors are OK to use currently.

So far, no attacks, but as it hasn't appeared on the paper's website, this is the first time it's been online...

(CD A-Z: Still on the home-burnt selection. Currently enjoying a very nice 80s mix by VJTrip...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Faking it for real

As Donald “I’m really great, everybody says so” Trump is so fond of pointing out, there is a lot of fake news around nowadays. Honest. Your friends at Facebook think so too, and have recently been publishing their top tips for spotting false news – by placing them as ads in newspapers. Considering they came in for considerable criticism themselves, that’s like shouting “Squirrel!” and pointing at a tree whilst you hastily kick away the prize begonias you just trampled. To help you make sense of this (and because I’m a caring person), I thought I’d run you through their suggestions and help to explain them for you. I know. I’m lovely. 1. Be sceptical of headlines READING THIS ARTICLE WILL IMPROVE YOUR SEX LIFE!!! And explain that catchy headlines, or stuff all in capitals might be a bit iffy. 2. Look closely at the URL You can find out more about this at www.wowyouregullible.com if you want to understand how phony web addresses are a sure sign of dodgyness. 3. Investigate...