Skip to main content

Is it OK to play gay?

Jack Whitehall - not gay. Problem?

A new Disney movie is in production.

Not particularly massive news in itself, but the film, called Jungle Cruise, will be the first Disney flick to have a major character who is an openly gay man.

The actor taking on this role, and the associated headache of having to deal with the moral arguments that have ensued, is British – namely Jack Whitehall.

Whitehall says he’s “honoured to be part of this epic adventure”, along with co-stars Emily Blunt and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. Whilst there’s plenty of support for Whitehall on social media, there are also many who aren’t pleased at all about him being cast in the role.

That the first significantly gay role in a Disney movie will be played by a straight guy hasn’t gone down well in some quarters, but the arguments for and against this are complicated.

One point of view is that there’s no reason to cast a gay man to play the role – gay actors play straight parts, and it’s rare anyone bats an eyelid. Shouldn’t a role go to the best actor to play the part, regardless of their sexual preference?

Scarlett Johansson saved herself from a lot of further grief when she removed herself from a movie that would have seen her playing a trans role. Ruby Rose (who says she is “gender fluid”) confessed to being thrilled to get the lead role as openly lesbian Batwoman, but has subsequently deleted her Twitter account following abuse.

That said, things get even more complicated at the suggestion of someone playing a part when the character portrayed has a different ethnicity – as in the original book or story. Here, it’s harder to justify and, increasingly, actors are becoming reluctant to take on these roles (or pulling out of them) due to the backlash from outraged members of the public voicing their anger.

Deadpool actor Ed Skrein withdrew from playing a character of Asian heritage in a Hellboy reboot, with the Brit admitting he was unaware of the character’s comic book origins. So is the fault with the movie makers, rather than the actors themselves? Is this purely about the numbers? Is there a financial benefit to ethnicity-bending in a film?

And we haven’t even touched on the thorny issue of disabled characters being played by able-bodied ones.

Jungle Cruise could be rubbish. It might not be what it’s remembered for, though.

This post first appeared as my 'A wry look at the week' column, in The Mail, on Friday the 17th of August 2018. The paper re-titled it as "Playing it too straight, Disney?"

Hot topic this, and exceedingly easy to put your foot in it and offend/antagonise someone, such is the sensitivity around the subject matter, the range of opinions, and difficulty is knowing what language and descriptors are OK to use currently.

So far, no attacks, but as it hasn't appeared on the paper's website, this is the first time it's been online...

(CD A-Z: Still on the home-burnt selection. Currently enjoying a very nice 80s mix by VJTrip...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

A fisful of change at the shops

A recent day out reminded me how much the retail experience has altered during my lifetime – and it’s not all good. I could stop typing this, and buy a fridge, in a matter of seconds. The shops are shut and it’s 9pm, but I could still place the order and arrange delivery. I haven’t got to wander round a white-goods retail emporium trying to work out which slightly different version of something that keeps my cider cold is better. It’ll be cheaper, too. But in amongst the convenience, endless choice and bargains, we’ve lost some of the personal, human, touches that used to make a trip to the shops something more than just a daily chore. Last weekend, we visited a local coastal town. Amongst the shops selling over-priced imported home accessories (who doesn’t need another roughly-hewn wooden heart, poorly painted and a bargain at £10?) was one that looked different. It’s window allowed you to see in, rather than being plastered with stick-on graphics and special offers calling ...

Making an exhibition of yourself

Now and again, it’s good to reaffirm that you’re a (relatively) normal human being. One excellent way of doing this is to go to a business exhibition. Despite what you might have surmised from reading my previous columns, I am employable, and even capable of acting like a regular person most of the time, even joining in the Monday morning conversation about the weather over the weekend, and why (insert name of footyballs manager here) should be fired immediately. The mug! True, there are times, often involving a caffeine deficiency, where it is like having the distilled essence of ten moody teenagers in the room, but I try and get that out of the way when people I genuinely like aren’t around to see it. As part of my ongoing experiment with what others call ‘working’, my ‘job’ involves me occasionally needing to go and see what some of my colleagues get up to outside the office, and what our competitors do to try and make sure that they do whatever my colleagues do better than ...