Skip to main content

Is it OK to play gay?

Jack Whitehall - not gay. Problem?

A new Disney movie is in production.

Not particularly massive news in itself, but the film, called Jungle Cruise, will be the first Disney flick to have a major character who is an openly gay man.

The actor taking on this role, and the associated headache of having to deal with the moral arguments that have ensued, is British – namely Jack Whitehall.

Whitehall says he’s “honoured to be part of this epic adventure”, along with co-stars Emily Blunt and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. Whilst there’s plenty of support for Whitehall on social media, there are also many who aren’t pleased at all about him being cast in the role.

That the first significantly gay role in a Disney movie will be played by a straight guy hasn’t gone down well in some quarters, but the arguments for and against this are complicated.

One point of view is that there’s no reason to cast a gay man to play the role – gay actors play straight parts, and it’s rare anyone bats an eyelid. Shouldn’t a role go to the best actor to play the part, regardless of their sexual preference?

Scarlett Johansson saved herself from a lot of further grief when she removed herself from a movie that would have seen her playing a trans role. Ruby Rose (who says she is “gender fluid”) confessed to being thrilled to get the lead role as openly lesbian Batwoman, but has subsequently deleted her Twitter account following abuse.

That said, things get even more complicated at the suggestion of someone playing a part when the character portrayed has a different ethnicity – as in the original book or story. Here, it’s harder to justify and, increasingly, actors are becoming reluctant to take on these roles (or pulling out of them) due to the backlash from outraged members of the public voicing their anger.

Deadpool actor Ed Skrein withdrew from playing a character of Asian heritage in a Hellboy reboot, with the Brit admitting he was unaware of the character’s comic book origins. So is the fault with the movie makers, rather than the actors themselves? Is this purely about the numbers? Is there a financial benefit to ethnicity-bending in a film?

And we haven’t even touched on the thorny issue of disabled characters being played by able-bodied ones.

Jungle Cruise could be rubbish. It might not be what it’s remembered for, though.

This post first appeared as my 'A wry look at the week' column, in The Mail, on Friday the 17th of August 2018. The paper re-titled it as "Playing it too straight, Disney?"

Hot topic this, and exceedingly easy to put your foot in it and offend/antagonise someone, such is the sensitivity around the subject matter, the range of opinions, and difficulty is knowing what language and descriptors are OK to use currently.

So far, no attacks, but as it hasn't appeared on the paper's website, this is the first time it's been online...

(CD A-Z: Still on the home-burnt selection. Currently enjoying a very nice 80s mix by VJTrip...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.