Don’t dump charity giving because of Oxfam scandal

Wow. Can’t say I’d want to be working for Oxfam’s PR department this week.

The scandal-hit charity stands accused of covering up details about it’s staff hiring prostitutes in Haiti, whilst delivering aid to the country after the devastating earthquake there in 2010. Whilst Oxfam did confirm that sexual misconduct took place, and people were sacked or resigned as a result, it is now in the spotlight for allegedly failing to give all the details.

There have also been claims of sexual harassment in their high street stores in the UK too, and that no volunteer staff had any criminal checks run on them. With the charity, and public confidence in them, shaken badly, on Tuesday the chairman of Oxfam International was arrested in Guatemala. Although part of an investigation into corruption relating to his time as the country’s finance minister, its another reputational hammer-blow. Their deputy chief executive in the UK, Penny Lawrence, has already resigned, saying she was “ashamed” of the charity’s actions, whilst taking full responsibility.

With nearly £200m of their funding last year coming from legacies, donations and sales in their shops, the loss public trust, and subsequent drop in income, could be devastating, not just for the charity, but those it supports.

International Development Committee member Paul Scully, MP summed it up neatly, saying “the long term concern about this is the risk of people not wanting to donate to charities that do amazing work.”

If its just Oxfam that takes a hit, that’s serious enough. The knock-on effect to other charities is potentially catastrophic. If their income falls because the public are distrusting of them in general, the immense help and support provided by so many brilliant organisations will have to be scaled back. The recipients of that help and support will be the ones who suffer.

Yes, Oxfam need to be investigated and, if allegations are confirmed as true, severely reprimanded for their actions. Of course, they may not be the only charity with skeletons in their closet. But take a look at any organisation from any sector - Banking, governments... maybe even the one you work for. Are they whiter than white? Never done anything wrong? No inefficiency? No waste of money?

Charities aren’t perfect, but the overwhelming majority are staffed by dedicated, honest, people who will be just as appalled by what’s being revealed about Oxfam as anyone else. They need funds to be able to continue to do the wonderful work that you’ve been donating to.

Stop that generosity, and you won’t alter the fact that some bad apples have tainted one of the largest, most recognised, charities. It won’t undo the terrible things they’ve done.

What it will do is mean that the vital funding that helps sick children, war veterans, famine victims or even poorly hedgehogs, and everything and everyone else who benefits, will become scarce. Less money = less help.

Scrutinise the charities. Ask difficult questions. Demand high standards. But don’t stop giving.

This post first appeared as the lead piece in my column/page in The Mail and the News & Star, on the 16th of February 2018, where it was re-titled as "Don't dump giving to charity".

It would appear that this is a story that isn't going away any time soon.

(CD A-Z: Eddie Vinson - "Cleanhead Blues".)

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog