Amazon chuck out the checkouts

A pint of milk, and a lifelong sense of paranoia, please...

Supermarket shopping. It’s hard to describe it as fun.

Whilst your trolley etiquette may be top notch, everybody else seems to park theirs at a rakish angle, stop where you can’t get past them or generally make a nuisance of themselves in a myriad of depressing ways.

The supermarket always seems to have moved things around, forcing you to tour the whole store only to have to go back to the start to find your favourite baked beans that used to live at the other end.

Once you’ve queued interminably behind the elderly couple who put their corned beef and spam tins on the conveyor one at a time, you then face the checkout assistants. Despite the risk of offending them all so much I can never set foot in a shop again, I’ll offer my opinion that they fall broadly into the categories:

Insanely cheerful and chatty. What do they know that we don’t? Why do they think this is fun?

Proficient but they’d gladly strangle you with a Bag For Life if it got them off-shift 5 minutes earlier.

Unable to identify a potato on their roller of loose veg prices, or accept that you’re over 18 when you’re 50+.

Handily, those friendly folks at Amazon (they don’t want to take over the entire world, honest) have spent a year testing out a store with no tills, conveyor belts, or awkward conversations about why you’ve got 26 tins of custard.

By simply scanning a QR code on the way in, the system will recognise you and, using cameras and sensors, detect what you’re putting in your bag as you peruse the custard section (I’m presuming there IS a custard section. They’ll have lost my custom immediately if there isn’t).

Once you’re done, you simply walk out and your shopping is charged to your account. Fast. Efficient. Thoroughly scary. If George Orwell, author of dystopian nightmare Big Brother, was writing his book today, he’d probably see this and decide his story wasn’t nearly paranoid enough.

Still, we already give away information about ourselves every waking (and sleeping) moment – from our phones and computers via fitness apps, location data, where we shop, what we read, what websites we visit etc.

Amazon already know what I’ve purchased going back 10 years or more, and track what I’ve looked at on their website so they can show it to me again later, or compare it with something else. All very useful, as long as you suppress the urge to run screaming from the house and throw your computer in the nearest lake. Not that that would help.

Replace “Santa” with “Amazon” in the Christmas tune about the jolly chap coming to town and you get “He sees you when you’re sleeping, he knows when you’re awake, he know if you’ve been bad or good, other users purchased The Best of The Nolans after viewing Sheena Easton’s Greatest Hits”.

Still, if you bury the fear that a faceless gigantic corporation knows everything about you with minimal control over what they do with that information, then this shop sounds great. The beautiful irony is that, on it’s first day of opening, there was a gigantic queue anyway... to get in.

Remember: Until it comes to the UK, adopting this process is called shoplifting.

This post first appeared as the main piece in my column/page in The Mail and the News & Star, on the 26th of January 2018. Good to see the strapline for the page has been updated to "A wry look at the week", which feels a bit more 'me' than the previous "Cumbria's grumpiest columnist". This week's page 2 teaser just had the previous photo of me, and "Columnist Peter Grenville" under the heading of "Opinion". Fair enough...

Still haven't seen a copy of the News & Star yet, but I'm presuming it's the same layout.

Nice to have the freedom to not have to stick precisely to 500 words as, with the other two smaller pieces and images, the layout can accommodate going over or under.

Not entirely sure of exactly how many times I'v now sneaked Sheena Easton into a column (must be half a dozen by now) but this is the first outing for The Nolans.

(CD A-Z: KT Tunstall's "Tiger Suit".)

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog