Skip to main content

New vacuum regs really suck/All in a spin

Two fantastically daft technology stories for the price of one!

It’s been a great couple of weeks for white goods madness.

I’m not even including Apple having to release a ‘fix’ to allow iPhone6 users to uninstall their free copy of U2’s new album. If this has happened to you, try and remember that you deleted the files, or you might wind up searching for them, only to find yourself saying “I still haven’t found what I’m looking for”.

Panic buying gripped consumers recently, as they rushed to their nearest vacuum cleaner-retailing emporium (or it’s virtual equivalent) to buy devices that really suck, before its too late.

Every man-in-the-pub’s favourite baddies, the EU, have decreed that our lovely, British, vacuums (probably made in Korea) can only suck to the tune of 1600 watts, meaning new ones have the potential to be as effective as the wheezy kid at school in the 100 yard dash on sports day.

If that wasn’t bad enough, the Brussels Bureaucrats will only allow us 900 paltry watts after 2017. Any remaining stock of super-hoovers can still be purchased, but once they’re all gone, it’ll probably be quicker to pick the dust up individually with tweezers than get the vacuum out of the cupboard.

Gone will be the heady days of accidentally catching the bottom of the curtains with the hose, and tearing half the ceiling down. And how will kids irritate their siblings? An attack with the formerly reverse-tornado business end of a new device will provide as much peril as being a bit close to your hamster when it breathes in sharply.

Of course, the intention is to use less power, and coax manufacturers into more efficient technology to achieve the same results, but I’m not one for letting common sense get in the way of a damn good moan.

What’s next? Kettles that heat up more slowly than if you just left a cup with water in it out in the sun? Light breeze hairdryers?! (Although that last one isn’t an issue for me, unfortunately.)

Then there’s the fantastic story of the spat between Samsung and LG, which has descended to a level of cattiness normally reserved for around 3am on a particularly emotional hen night.

Samsung has accused it’s rival of deliberately vandalising some of their washing machines in a showroom in Germany. LG claim it was an accident, and they had only been examining their rival’s machines, and the hinges were rubbish anyway.

The authorities have been asked to investigate, and we can only hope that they look into this shocking case thoroughly, before telling the two electronic giants to grow up, stop acting like petulant children, and then send them to bed early.

Representatives of the two companies were last seen drunkenly flailing their handbags at each other round the back of the bins outside the nightclub, whilst swearing loudly about how one looked at the other one’s boyfriend in a funny way.

This post should have appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column, in the North West Evening Mail, on the 19th of September 2014. Unfortunately, for the second week in a row, it hasn't made it onto their website. I haven't see the print copy yet (it usually arrives in the post on Monday), so I can't confirm it went in there either. Fingers crossed.

Early ideas for this one involved an entire 500 word piece around the U2/iPhone thing, and a whole column solely on the subject of lower wattage vacuum cleaners, and what might get de-powered in the future. The Samsung vs LG story was also ripe for a full piece, but three tech stories in a row might have been pushing my luck a bit.

I suppose I could have gone for something about the Scottish Referendum, but as I have to submit the column on Wednesday night, it could only have been a "whatever they decided" piece, and I'm wary of taking political sides, even in a humorous way, as there are a lot of very earnest people out there without any sense of humour at all.

And besides, I'm, just too damn lazy to research that kind of story too...

( Music today from a 4CD box set of Mike Oldfield, called "Elements", from 1993.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with...

A fisful of change at the shops

A recent day out reminded me how much the retail experience has altered during my lifetime – and it’s not all good. I could stop typing this, and buy a fridge, in a matter of seconds. The shops are shut and it’s 9pm, but I could still place the order and arrange delivery. I haven’t got to wander round a white-goods retail emporium trying to work out which slightly different version of something that keeps my cider cold is better. It’ll be cheaper, too. But in amongst the convenience, endless choice and bargains, we’ve lost some of the personal, human, touches that used to make a trip to the shops something more than just a daily chore. Last weekend, we visited a local coastal town. Amongst the shops selling over-priced imported home accessories (who doesn’t need another roughly-hewn wooden heart, poorly painted and a bargain at £10?) was one that looked different. It’s window allowed you to see in, rather than being plastered with stick-on graphics and special offers calling ...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...