Skip to main content

Missing aircraft? That’s plane ridiculous

It’s now 2 weeks since Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 disappeared.

In this technology-stuffed age, how can an aeroplane simply vanish?

Let’s face it, we’ve all lost stuff. Keys, wallet, you name it – I’ve even spent half an hour trying to find my car in a multi-story car park once (I was on the wrong floor). But I’ve always found my missing stuff again. An aeroplane, especially one carrying 227 passengers and 12 crew, isn’t the sort of thing you can easily mislay though.

So why is it, 14 days later, that there still seems to be no sign of it? Unlike the glossy, strange series ‘Lost’, it seems pretty unlikely that the aircraft’s occupants are now living some alternative existence on a desert island. Although, very much in common with the TV show, this real-life drama seems to have plot twists and turns that are sometimes bizarre and hard to believe.

When the flight from Kuala Lumpur disappeared, I sadly assumed I’d be hearing evidence of a disastrous crash into the sea, discovered shortly afterwards. When that didn’t happen, it seemed odd, but perhaps not surprising – we are talking about a big area of water to search.

But with no distress signal or message after a final “All right, good night” on leaving Malaysian airspace, there should have been at least some evidence that something had gone wrong. And then this week it was revealed that the flight’s transponder appears to have been deliberately shut down.

With 26 countries now involved in the search, recent information has revealed that comms with a satellite did occur, and that the flight may have continued for a further 7 hours after regular transmissions ceased.

The theory now seems to be that the cessation of transmissions, and an apparent change of course, were deliberate, and suspicion has fallen on passengers and crew alike.

But where has MH370 gone? It’s hard to hide an aeroplane, and even tougher to silence and hide 239 people. On it’s own, my knackered 3 year old phone seems intent on telling the world precisely where I am, so it would seem reasonable to think that if governments can spy on their own people, they should be equally capable of tracking down a whole load of them and a very big metal thing.

Similarly, Amazon seem to know everything I’ve ordered for the last decade, so you’d assume that tracking something as genuinely important as a plane should re relatively easy compared to knowing when my copy of Queen’s Greatest Hits III was despatched. But apparently not.

There is a precedent though. In 2009, an Air France Airbus A-330 crashed in the Atlantic, but it was two years before the black box flight recorders were recovered, and the sorry tale of it’s final minutes finally revealed.

Let’s hope that the families of those on Flight MH370 don’t have to wait as long to finally get answers to what happened to their loved ones.

This post may or may not have first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column in the North West Evening Mail, on the 21st of March 2014. It hasn't appeared on their website yet, so I don't know if it has actually been published until my print copy arrives in the post on Monday. You can always keep a look out for it on their website.

At the time of writing this blog post, the story had appeared to be taking a major turn as the last couple of days revealed satellite images appearing to show large pieces of debris, which were being investigated by Australian authorities. Sadly, whatever they were hasn't been found so far, so the mystery continues.

For me, this was quite a departure in terms of my usual writing style. As I have to submit the column on Wednesday night, I tend to avoid any topic that might suddenly change, and I actually wrote the piece on Tuesday. Clearly, Thursday and Friday involved me checking the news to see if my article had been rendered obsolete. Bar the later details of the search, it hasn't. Yet.

I should probably stick to what I know best - which is nothing, hence the usual random nonsense.

ManCave news! As of yesterday, I'm in the redecorated and reorganised room, minus record player and collection, and a lot less shelving. This (unsurprisingly) is resulting in me looking at boxes of stuff and thinking "where the hell am I going to put all that?". Some of it might have to take it's changes in the cellar...

(Compilation CDs still? Of course. This one features a bundle of mash-ups from the rather brilliant GoHomeProductions.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi