Skip to main content

Senna

The lovely @Catpaws123 off of the twitter suggested I should write a review of the Senna film, having seen it yesterday evening in Ambleside.

First of all, I should point out that I am plenty old enough to have been a big F1 fan, with my rear end firmly planted on the sofa, at the time of Ayrton's fateful end.

I, like so many others, was enthralled by the titanic struggles Ayrton was enduring trying to haul the Williams car, stripped of its active doo-dahs and traction wotsits, to the front of the field.

So I began watching this with some trepidation. Whilst I was shocked by the frightening accident a youthful Barrichello suffered that weekend at Imola, and appalled by the death of Ratzenberger, I didn't feel like I really knew either of them. Senna, though - how could you not marvel at Ayrton? I'd watched him die once; I wasn't sure I wanted to go through that again.

The film-makers are sympathetic towards Senna, which is not surprising. Alain Prost comes across regularly as a demonic, twisted genius, with the boy from Brazil the innocent victim. My recollections are that it was much nearer a 50/50 split. Ayrton was reckless sometimes, Prost too willing to play the political card at others. The only time Ayrton come across badly in this film is a breathtaking moment when he berates Jackie Stewart for daring to suggest that he'd had quite a large amount of crashes.

Watching the movie also rolls back the years. When you think of Ron Dennis, you picture emotionless scion of the McLaren empire. Barrichello the old-timer, seeing out his years, Eddie Jordan the crazed former Team Principal wearing daft shirts and forgetting to actually ask a question on the BBC. Here, Ron is a cheeky, playful chap at the top of his game, Rubens the youthful driver starting out on his F1 career, and EJ the large-specs-wearing, clean-shaven, brown haired geezer running a small-budget F1 team (although, to be fair, the shirt was still pretty gaudy).

You also glimpse many other drivers and team crew who were early in their careers, and massively so during the amazing footage taken during driver briefings. F1 drivers are cool, right? Toned Gods in racesuits, all 80's hair and bravado. Oh, and some English bloke called Nigel sporting a tache and wearing a flat cap. But the significance of these moments is the gob-smacking exchanges between Senna, the other drivers and Jean-Marie Balestre, then head of the FIA, and (going on this footage) the most arrogant, biased, deluded and volatile man to have ever got near an F1 car, let alone have control of all things F1. You think Bernie's a tough-nut? Think again.

But perhaps the thing that will stick with me most was the on-board footage from Senna's car. Unlike the images here, camera location and technology from modern F1's gathers its images from above the driver's head, in high quality and steady. The footage in this film is at driver's eye level, lower quality, and every jolt, bump and vibration is displayed, but by God, for all it's imperfections, it is electrifying. With the more open cockpits of the day, and much less refined cars, the steering efforts of Ayrton, the constant micro-adjustments, car-sliding and flat-out brilliance as he flings his car round tracks is jaw-dropping. I had my heart in my mouth all over again watching it, willing him not to clip a barrier or spin off.

And, as it had to, we reach the end. The accident that still can't be properly explained, and the fatal injury that was the cruelest of flukes. The adulation Ayrton was held in, and the despair of his countrymen and women is humbling. All these years on, I had tears in my eyes all over again.

The movie is brilliant. A wonderful story, filled with moments of humour, loneliness, agony, ecstasy, skill, hatred and love. And finally sadness. It's tough going through it again.

But worth it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Faking it for real

As Donald “I’m really great, everybody says so” Trump is so fond of pointing out, there is a lot of fake news around nowadays. Honest. Your friends at Facebook think so too, and have recently been publishing their top tips for spotting false news – by placing them as ads in newspapers. Considering they came in for considerable criticism themselves, that’s like shouting “Squirrel!” and pointing at a tree whilst you hastily kick away the prize begonias you just trampled. To help you make sense of this (and because I’m a caring person), I thought I’d run you through their suggestions and help to explain them for you. I know. I’m lovely. 1. Be sceptical of headlines READING THIS ARTICLE WILL IMPROVE YOUR SEX LIFE!!! And explain that catchy headlines, or stuff all in capitals might be a bit iffy. 2. Look closely at the URL You can find out more about this at www.wowyouregullible.com if you want to understand how phony web addresses are a sure sign of dodgyness. 3. Investigate...