Skip to main content

Embrace the cynical!

By


If you work in a team, you’ll no doubt have at least one person that everyone is slightly uncomfortable with.

In a meeting, they’ll sit there quietly, whilst everyone else is enthusing about the latest super-whizzo idea that’s going to reduce costs/save the world/make a million (delete as applicable). Just as you’re all about to reach a frenzied crescendo of exhilarated back-slapping at the sheer, shared, greatness of it all, they’ll calmly point out the things that could go wrong and scupper your revolutionary plans. No-one wants to hear that – it’s nice and sunny in your happy little world, and that natural doom-merchant has just caused the clouds of failure to roll ominously in. It’s about as welcome as a fart in a spacesuit. But, deep down, you know they’re right… damn them.

Meet your natural cynic. They’re the glass-half-empty (and possibly cracked) ones. You could tell them they’ve won the lotto and their first reaction would be concern about whether they are capable of letting joy into their facial expression range. It’s impossible to explain why, but they carry a faint air of sadness with them.

You badly need that person on your team, though. The one that always sees potential problems – even if they might seem outrageously unlikely. Without them, you plough on with all your happy-enthusiastic types in control and fail to spot key potential problems or pitfalls. They’re not popular, they’re gloomy, they foretell doom and disaster. But ignore them and that’s exactly what you’ll get. Their insight, however uncomfortable, will mean your wonder-plan actually works. By listening to them and then acting on their alarm-bells, you might just head off something terrible before it happens.

They don’t get the praise they deserve either. Because you DID begrudgingly heed their sage warning and adapt accordingly it all went smoothly, so it’s easy to fall into the trap of ignoring them next time. Do so at your peril.

They’re the ones making sure your plans actually work; by anticipating the problems and using their doom-laden spider senses to avert disaster. They might not wear a cape, but they may just be the troubled superhero with a dark back-story we all need to save our collective day.

There’s a big difference between cynical and negative. Don’t mix them up.

Negative is bad. But love your team cynics. It’ easy to dismiss them as just out to rain on your parade, but they’re the ones that checked the weather forecast and suggested you bring a brolly. And wellies. And possibly an ark.

They probably loathe their reputation. Who wants to be the party-pooper? But you shouldn’t try to make them change. You need them at their death-around-every-corner sharpest.

Embrace the cynical. You’ll be better off if you do.

We love you, cynical ones. Let us never speak of this again.


(Originally written for LinkedIn. Yup.)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

By
If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...
Post a Comment
Read more

Suffering from natural obsolescence

By
You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shouting in the social media mirror

By
It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...
Post a Comment
Read more