Does action need to be taken to stop more deaths on Mount Everest?

If I decided to clamber onto the parapet of Walney Bridge and stroll along, you’d hopefully tell me to get down immediately – it’s dangerous.

If I fell off, you’d be forgiven for saying you warned me, and that I was a fool for putting myself at risk like that.

What if I’d spent years practising on the top of a low brick wall? Or been trained by an expert? Or had the right equipment, did it when the conditions were right, and had a permit to do so?

I’d wager that you’d still say I chose to put my own life in danger.

Scaled up to a mountainous level, is there much difference between my hypothetical bridge wander, and someone choosing to attempt Everest? As far as I can tell, no-one who has died on the massive mountain was forced into going up – they did it out of choice, for personal fulfilment and adventure. To take on an incredible physical challenge and overcome the danger to achieve something amazing.

It seems that a variety of reasons are behind the large rise in deaths there this spring, including weather delays, inexperienced climbers, cost-cutting competition leading to inexperienced guides, liaison officers not showing up and subsequent bad crowd-management.

Exhausted climbers, running low on oxygen, queueing for hours to attempt the final ascent – that’s a recipe for disaster.

But everyone on Everest is there because they want to be. It’s a hugely dangerous environment, and ultimately you’re responsible for your own safety, be that training, equipment, guides, planning, fitness, oxygen supplies... whatever.

It is still a big risk, no matter how well-prepared you are. But it’s up to the individual to do everything they can to mitigate that. At any point before or during, they can choose to abandon the ascent if they believe the risks are too high. Ultimately, it’s still their choice if they go ahead.

This post first appeared as part of The Mail's 'Taking to the Podium' section, on Monday the 3rd of June 2019.

Tough question this one - I can see that failings by others (guides, authorities, regulation etc.) are contributing factors, over which climbers may have limited control.

(Tape Time: No. 218, recorded on the 15th of October 1988, and featuring Tangerine Dream's "Livemiles", plus tracks from Madness, Peter Gabriel and Freddie Mercury.)

Comments

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

Shouting in the social media mirror

It was always tricky to fit everything you wanted into the intentionally short character count of Twitter, especially when, like me, you tend to write ridiculously long sentences that keep going on and on, with no discernible end in sight, until you start wondering what the point was in the first place. The maximum length of a text message originally limited a tweet to 140 characters, due to it being a common way to post your ramblings in Twitter’s early days. Ten years later, we’ve largely consigned texting to the tech dustbin, and after a lot of angst, the social media platform’s bigwigs have finally opted to double your ranting capacity to 280. Responses ranged from “You’ve ruined it! Closing my account!” to the far more common “Meh” of modern disinterest. As someone rightly pointed out, just because you have twice as much capacity doesn’t mean you actually have to use it. It is, of course, and excellent opportunity to use the English language correctly and include punctuat...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog