Skip to main content

Does action need to be taken to stop more deaths on Mount Everest?

If I decided to clamber onto the parapet of Walney Bridge and stroll along, you’d hopefully tell me to get down immediately – it’s dangerous.

If I fell off, you’d be forgiven for saying you warned me, and that I was a fool for putting myself at risk like that.

What if I’d spent years practising on the top of a low brick wall? Or been trained by an expert? Or had the right equipment, did it when the conditions were right, and had a permit to do so?

I’d wager that you’d still say I chose to put my own life in danger.

Scaled up to a mountainous level, is there much difference between my hypothetical bridge wander, and someone choosing to attempt Everest? As far as I can tell, no-one who has died on the massive mountain was forced into going up – they did it out of choice, for personal fulfilment and adventure. To take on an incredible physical challenge and overcome the danger to achieve something amazing.

It seems that a variety of reasons are behind the large rise in deaths there this spring, including weather delays, inexperienced climbers, cost-cutting competition leading to inexperienced guides, liaison officers not showing up and subsequent bad crowd-management.

Exhausted climbers, running low on oxygen, queueing for hours to attempt the final ascent – that’s a recipe for disaster.

But everyone on Everest is there because they want to be. It’s a hugely dangerous environment, and ultimately you’re responsible for your own safety, be that training, equipment, guides, planning, fitness, oxygen supplies... whatever.

It is still a big risk, no matter how well-prepared you are. But it’s up to the individual to do everything they can to mitigate that. At any point before or during, they can choose to abandon the ascent if they believe the risks are too high. Ultimately, it’s still their choice if they go ahead.

This post first appeared as part of The Mail's 'Taking to the Podium' section, on Monday the 3rd of June 2019.

Tough question this one - I can see that failings by others (guides, authorities, regulation etc.) are contributing factors, over which climbers may have limited control.

(Tape Time: No. 218, recorded on the 15th of October 1988, and featuring Tangerine Dream's "Livemiles", plus tracks from Madness, Peter Gabriel and Freddie Mercury.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Grand Prix - Vettel hot, but not bothered

Malaysia. It's always hot, and it always rains. Except the 2nd part is no longer true (unless you count the drizzly bit around lap 14). Saturday's qualifying session had highlighted the fact that Red Bull and McLaren seemed well matched on pace, but also that Ferrari were struggling. Whilst Vettel bagged another pole, followed by Hamilton, Webber and Button, Alonso was only 5th, and Massa 7th, with Nick Heidfeld an excellent 6th on the grid between the two red cars. At this point, I would like to break momentarily for a small rant: How many times do I have to say Heidfeld is good? Why wasn't he given a top drive years ago? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?! ARE YOU BLIND!!!?? Ahem. The Hispanias somehow managed to a) turn up b) remember to bring cars c) get both of them on the track d) actually get both of them within 107%. Pretty remarkable really. Oh, and it didn't rain. Race day looked a more likely candidate for a drop of the wet stuff. The start was exciting, with

I know I'll regret this...

For @Feisty_Onion @BroughtonLass @LizWestmorland Me... before the grumpiness set in. Have a great weekend.

Senna bags Willy drive?

The great thing about F1 rumours is that they change every 5 minutes. Just last week it was looking like Barrichello might be back in at Williams, as new engines, tech staff and a general reshuffle would mean they needed someone who actually knew what they were doing in an F1 car. Which rules out Maldonado, obviously. Now it looks like Senna might be about to get a seat with the team where his Uncle lost his life. I'm sure Bruno's mum must be delighted. I don't hold with all this superstitious mumbo-jumbo though, and with the extraordinary level of safety in modern F1 cars, Bruno should be pretty safe. There is one significant problem with Williams signing him though - and this is going to be a bit unpopular I suspect - Bruno isn't very good. Yes, he put in a couple of reasonable performances with Renault, but Nick Heidfeld (ah... Nick and his lovely beard...) would have been able to do likewise, has he not been dropped. And then they dropped Senna too. Thi