Getting the House in order

"£4billion for cash, mate?"

I had a plasterer and electrician round this week.

The work they did cost me getting on for £570. Add another seven zeroes to that, and you’ll reach 5.7billion quid – the possible cost of repairing the crumbling Houses of Parliament.

The nursery rhyme got it wrong – it’s not London Bridge that’s falling down, it’s London’s parliamentary home. After 150 years of literally plastering over the cracks and carrying out running repairs, the Grade 1 listed building is at risk of sinking, falling to bits, catching fire or an exciting combination of all three at the same time, thanks to outdated cabling, a sewage system straight out of an engineering museum, and an extra large helping of chronic indecision.

Despite a report five years ago warning that damage may be major and irreversible, MPs are still having a good old think about it, and unlikely to come up with an answer for another year and a half.

Politicians putting off a decision that might prove unpopular with the people who elect them? There’s a shock. Unfortunately, by continually putting their fingers in their ears and humming a pretty tune whenever it’s been mentioned, the problem has continued to get worse and, importantly, even more costly.

It seems there are a few options available to our elected parliamentarians whilst the work goes on. They could carry on shouting “humbug!” at each other and acting like spoilt children whilst it is carried out around them (presumably by responsible adults on lower wages) – this option would take ages (a bit like some MPs when asked to get to the point), and be very costly.

They could move out in bits (Commons first, then Lords), which would save a few quid, or hand the keys over to the men and women in hard-hats and hi-vis jackets, and decamp en masse to another location.

This final option would be quickest and cheapest... although the word “cheap” doesn’t really apply when you’re talking about a bill with that many zeros. And where are they all going to go?

I’ve got a spare desk in my office – they can use that, as long as they keep the noise down and remember I don’t take sugar in my coffee. Imagine having that lot in the office next door, though? I bet Boris nicks all the Chocolate HobNobs, and you’d probably get fed up with Jeremy insisting on organic, fair trade, skimmed milk.

Maybe they can do all their shouting at each other and waving bits of paper via Skype, or have a few conference calls? Although it’s possible that Jacob will have denounced that sort of thing as evil wizardry.

Unless the simultaneous flaming/sinking/collapsing thing happens first (in which case a sizeable insurance claim is in order), this work will happen eventually, and expensively. I know a good plasterer, if it helps.

Thank the Lords we’re not paying for it eh? Oh, hang on... yeah, we will be.

Is a cheque OK? I can wave it in the air whilst shouting “bah!” angrily.

This post first appeared as my "Thank grumpy it's Friday" column, in The Mail, on the 27th of October, 2017. Both the version on their website and the print edition were re-titled as "Still getting their House in order".

I think I've reached a decision about whether to carry on the column. Mulling over it, as it feels like a significant thing to decide to pack it in. It has reached stage where I tend to be scrabbling around for an idea with the deadline looming, when once it was written and done days before, with another idea already mostly in place for the next one. Hmm...

(CD A-Z: Sparks - "Extended - the 12inch Mixes".)

Making an exhibition of yourself

Now and again, it’s good to reaffirm that you’re a (relatively) normal human being. One excellent way of doing this is to go to a business exhibition. Despite what you might have surmised from reading my previous columns, I am employable, and even capable of acting like a regular person most of the time, even joining in the Monday morning conversation about the weather over the weekend, and why (insert name of footyballs manager here) should be fired immediately. The mug! True, there are times, often involving a caffeine deficiency, where it is like having the distilled essence of ten moody teenagers in the room, but I try and get that out of the way when people I genuinely like aren’t around to see it. As part of my ongoing experiment with what others call ‘working’, my ‘job’ involves me occasionally needing to go and see what some of my colleagues get up to outside the office, and what our competitors do to try and make sure that they do whatever my colleagues do better than ...

"It's all gone quiet..." said Roobarb

If, like me, you grew up (and I’m aware of the irony in that) in the ‘70s, February was a tough month, with the sad news that Richard Briers and Bob Godfrey had died. Briers had a distinguished acting career and is, quite rightly, fondly remembered most for his character in ‘The Good Life’. Amongst his many roles, both serious and comedic, he also lent his voice to a startling bit of animation that burst it’s wobbly way on to our wooden-box-surrounded screens in 1974. The 1970s seemed to be largely hued in varying shades of beige, with hints of mustard yellow and burnt orange, and colour TV was a relatively new experience still, so the animated adventures of a daft dog and caustic cat who were the shades of dayglo green and pink normally reserved for highlighter pens, must have been a bit of a shock to the eyes at the time. It caused mine to open very wide indeed. Roobarb was written by Grange Calveley, and brought vividly into life by Godfrey, whose strange, shaky-looking sty...

Suffering from natural obsolescence

You know you’re getting old when it dawns on you that you’re outliving technological breakthroughs. You know the sort of thing – something revolutionary, that heralds a seismic shift it the way the modern world operates. Clever, time-saving, breathtaking and life-changing (and featuring a circuit board). It’s the future, baby! Until it isn’t any more. I got to pondering this when we laughed heartily in the office about someone asking if our camcorder used “tape”. Tape? Get with the times, Daddy-o! If it ain’t digital then for-get-it! I then attempted to explain to an impossibly young colleague that video tape in a camcorder was indeed once a “thing”, requiring the carrying of something the size of a briefcase around on your shoulder, containing batteries normally reserved for a bus, and a start-up time from pressing ‘Record’ so lengthy, couples were already getting divorced by the time it was ready to record them saying “I do”. After explaining what tape was, I realised I’d ...

grumpyf1

Search This Blog